THE KENNEL CLUB RESPONSE TO DISGRACEFUL MERSEYSIDE
‘DANGEROUS DOG AMNESTY’

The Kennel Club has learnt of Merseyside Constabulary’s intention to invoke its threatened
seven-day dangerous dogs ‘amnesty’ – or in reality a seven-day dog cull.

The Kennel Club is appalled by Merseyside’s decision and somewhat bewildered that it has
not taken on board any advice that it asked for from the Kennel Club as to how to protect the
public against dangerous dogs.

Said Caroline Kisko, Kennel Club Secretary: “We are dismayed that Merseyside
Constabulary has ignored our sensible advice which they asked for. We proposed a
workable alternative – to re-open the Index of Exempted Dogs for 3 months to owner led
application. They have gone ahead without listening and unfortunately their amnesty will
leave the public unprotected while only responsible owners and their dogs will suffer”.

The so called ‘amnesty’ is a poorly thought out and ineffective response to a tragic situation,
that will lead to the death of many well loved family pets and cause a great deal of distress to
dog owners.

The obvious flaws to the amnesty being introduced by Merseyside are that:

Some responsible owners will bring dogs forward to comply with the amnesty – their
well behaved dogs would then be destroyed based on how they look.

Other responsible owners will hide their dogs because they cannot bear to part with
them. This will drive responsible owners underground and as a result the welfare of
the dogs will suffer i.e. through less exercise, not visiting vets etc.

Meanwhile those irresponsible enough to be involved in dog fighting or training dogs
to be aggressive are not the sort of people that will come forward as they are not law
abiding. The Kennel Club deplores the training of dogs for fighting and agrees that pit
bull type dogs trained for fighting would not be eligible to be placed on the Index and
should be humanely destroyed.

Meanwhile the obvious benefits to the alternative proposed by the Kennel Club are that:

Re-opening the Index for three months would not allow for any more pit bull type dogs
to be bred but would allow for more owners of pit bull type dogs to be made aware of
the proposal and take responsible action.

Re-opening the Index would also help address the problem of limited Police
resources i.e. in terms of keeping dogs and seizing dogs once the amnesty is over.

Compliance with the Kennel Club proposal would be far easier and more effective -
rather than people hiding their dogs, more would register their dogs on the Index.
As required by the Index, these dogs would have to be on a lead and muzzled in public,
permanently identified and neutered - thereby ensuring the safety of all from any
possibility of dog bites.


6 February 2007 (047.07)
ENDS
For further information please contact
Press Office
020 7518 1008

press.office@thekennelclub.org.uk
www.thekennelclub.org.uk

Notes to Editors
The Index of Exempted Dogs is a register of pit bull type dogs that do not fall under the Dangerous
Dogs Act. When the Act was introduced in 1991, dog owners already in possession of a pit bull
type had time to register their dogs. However voluntary registration ended later in 1991. Since
1997 if an owner is prosecuted for possession of an unregistered pit bull type dog the Court may
allow the dog to be registered (and all of the other conditions must be complied with) but only if the
owner can prove that the dog would not constitute a danger to public safety.

Re-opening the Index of Exempted Dogs would allow owners of pit bull types to apply to a Court
for registration, without fear of prosecution, if they can prove to the Court that the dog would not
constitute a danger to public safety. If a dog was found to be aggressive then it would not be able
to be registered on the Index of Exempted Dogs and would be humanely destroyed. If however,
the dog in question was of a pit bull type but was well trained, had a responsible owner and
generally posed no threat to the public then it would be able to be registered on the Index.
If after three months the owner of a pit bull type dog failed to make an application, s/he would be in
breach of the law and at risk of having the dog seized.

The temperaments of pit bull type dogs vary significantly since a dog’s genetics (breed) has very
little to do with its behaviour. Research shows that this is influenced most by the dog’s owner, the
environment it lives in and the training it is given. In the wrong hands, any breed of dog can be
dangerous - the number of dog attacks by breeds other than those on the dangerous dogs list,
illustrates this. Similarly, any dog that has been trained by its owner appropriately and sufficiently
should not be outlawed or destroyed based on its breed alone.